Re: Problems building Zmailer

[tom@haven.uniserve.com (Tom Samplonius)]

At 11:33 AM 12/23/94 -0500, Greg A. Woods wrote:
>[ On Thu, December 22, 1994 at 23:01:53 (-0500), Tom Samplonius wrote: ]
>> Subject: Re: Problems building Zmailer
>>
>>   That seems reasonable.  BSDI is very close to FreeBSD (both BSD4.4 based),
>> so I expect that most of same things will apply.
>
>In fact there are a number of defines in <sys/param.h> that should be
>useful to key any 4.4BSD features from (i.e. BSD_44, I think it is).
>
>Please everyone be careful to research your portability fixes to find
>such manifest defines before using the first one that comes to mind.

  Good idea.  So why is there:


	#define static

in libsh/execute.c, libsh/interpret.c, etc.?  Is this actually required by a
large number of systems?

Tom